Subashini vs SHO periyathatchur ps — 1069/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVP010015092026

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

1258/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

1069/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Viluppuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

24

Police Station

Periyathachur P.S.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 108

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Subashini

    Adv. VIJAYARANGAN J

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHO (Station House Officer) periyathatchur ps (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    BailView PDF

    SUMMARY: The Principal Sessions Judge, Villupuram dismissed Subashini's anticipatory bail petition under Section 482 BNSS on 16 March 2026. Subashini was accused under Section 108 BNS of threatening and inducing her husband to commit suicide due to her illegal intimacy with co-accused A1. The court rejected her plea, noting that investigation was pending, her previous bail application was dismissed without changed circumstances, she remained absconding for a prolonged period, and the offence's seriousness warranted denial of bail despite co-accused A1's High Court bail grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1069/2026

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Principal Sessions Judge, Villupuram dismissed Subashini's anticipatory bail petition under Section 482 BNSS on 16 March 2026. Subashini was accused under Section 108 BNS of threatening and inducing her husband to commit suicide due to her illegal intimacy with co-accused A1. The court rejected her plea, noting that investigation was pending, her previous bail application was dismissed without changed circumstances, she remained absconding for a prolonged period, and the offence's seriousness warranted denial of bail despite co-accused A1's High Court bail grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case