Subashini vs SHO periyathatchur ps — 1069/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 16th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVP010015092026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

1258/2026

Filing Date

10-03-2026

Registration No

1069/2026

Registration Date

10-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Viluppuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

FIR Details

FIR Number

24

Police Station

Periyathachur P.S.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 108

Petitioner(s)

Subashini

Adv. VIJAYARANGAN J

Respondent(s)

SHO (Station House Officer) periyathatchur ps (Police Station)

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

16-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Bail

SUMMARY: The Principal Sessions Judge, Villupuram dismissed Subashini's anticipatory bail petition under Section 482 BNSS on 16 March 2026. Subashini was accused under Section 108 BNS of threatening and inducing her husband to commit suicide due to her illegal intimacy with co-accused A1. The court rejected her plea, noting that investigation was pending, her previous bail application was dismissed without changed circumstances, she remained absconding for a prolonged period, and the offence's seriousness warranted denial of bail despite co-accused A1's High Court bail grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Principal Sessions Judge, Villupuram dismissed Subashini's anticipatory bail petition under Section 482 BNSS on 16 March 2026. Subashini was accused under Section 108 BNS of threatening and inducing her husband to commit suicide due to her illegal intimacy with co-accused A1. The court rejected her plea, noting that investigation was pending, her previous bail application was dismissed without changed circumstances, she remained absconding for a prolonged period, and the offence's seriousness warranted denial of bail despite co-accused A1's High Court bail grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Viluppuram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case