Elumalai Alias Sadai vs SHO Gingee P.S. — 1061/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439(1)(b). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVP010015042026

Filing Number

1254/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

1061/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Viluppuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

558

Police Station

Gingee P.S.

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Elumalai Alias Sadai

    Adv. Ranjith Babu.A

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHO (Station House Officer) Gingee P.S.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    BailView PDF

    The Principal Sessions Judge, Villupuram allowed the petition filed by Elumalai @ Sadai under Section 483(1)(b) of BNSS, completely relaxing the bail condition requiring daily appearance at Gingee Police Station at 10:00 A.M. The court found that the petitioner had been regularly complying with the condition since 02.02.2026, had no pending cases, no criminal antecedents, and the Public Prosecutor did not object to relaxation, thereby granting full relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1061/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Sessions Judge, Villupuram allowed the petition filed by Elumalai @ Sadai under Section 483(1)(b) of BNSS, completely relaxing the bail condition requiring daily appearance at Gingee Police Station at 10:00 A.M. The court found that the petitioner had been regularly complying with the condition since 02.02.2026, had no pending cases, no criminal antecedents, and the Public Prosecutor did not object to relaxation, thereby granting full relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case