Manikandan vs SHO Town Police Station Villupuram. — 1019/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 24th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVP010014922026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1245/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

1019/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Viluppuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

FIR Details

FIR Number

65

Police Station

Villupuram Town P.S

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

Manikandan

Adv. Ramachandran. P

Respondent(s)

SHO (Station House Officer) Town Police Station Villupuram.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

24-03-2026

Disposed

23-03-2026

Appearance

16-03-2026

Appearance

11-03-2026

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

24-03-2026
Bail

Case Summary: CMP.No.1019/2026 Court Decision: The Principal Sessions Judge dismissed Manikandan's bail petition on March 24, 2026. The court found that while procedural irregularities existed in the arrest (contradictions in arrest location and delayed furnishing of grounds of arrest), the gravity of the alleged offense, the early investigation stage, risk of witness tampering, and one accused still absconding justified continued judicial custody. Key Facts: Manikandan, a suspended home guard police officer, was arrested for armed robbery of 4kg+ gold and ₹5.5 lakh cash. He was allegedly one of two masterminds among nine accused, with eight arrested. The court rejected arguments that he was falsely implicated based solely on a co-accused's confession, noting the offense's seriousness warranted custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CMP.No.1019/2026 Court Decision: The Principal Sessions Judge dismissed Manikandan's bail petition on March 24, 2026. The court found that while procedural irregularities existed in the arrest (contradictions in arrest location and delayed furnishing of grounds of arrest), the gravity of the alleged offense, the early investigation stage, risk of witness tampering, and one accused still absconding justified continued judicial custody. Key Facts: Manikandan, a suspended home guard police officer, was arrested for armed robbery of 4kg+ gold and ₹5.5 lakh cash. He was allegedly one of two masterminds among nine accused, with eight arrested. The court rejected arguments that he was falsely implicated based solely on a co-accused's confession, noting the offense's seriousness warranted custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Viluppuram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case