Abishek vs SHO West Police Station Villupuram — 1021/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVP010014862026

Filing Number

1239/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

1021/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Viluppuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

72

Police Station

Villupuram West P.S

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Abishek

    Adv. R.Ranjith

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHO (Station House Officer) West Police Station Villupuram

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    BailView PDF

    Case Summary: CMP.No.1021/2026 The Principal Sessions Judge granted Abishek bail for possession of 1.4 kg of tobacco products in violation of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Smoking and Spitting Act, after he spent 22 days in judicial custody. The court imposed stringent conditions including a non-refundable ₹1,000 donation to the Cancer Institute, a ₹10,000 bond with two sureties, and daily police station reporting, citing the health hazards of tobacco and the accused's previous pending cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Principal District Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1021/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CMP.No.1021/2026 The Principal Sessions Judge granted Abishek bail for possession of 1.4 kg of tobacco products in violation of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Smoking and Spitting Act, after he spent 22 days in judicial custody. The court imposed stringent conditions including a non-refundable ₹1,000 donation to the Cancer Institute, a ₹10,000 bond with two sureties, and daily police station reporting, citing the health hazards of tobacco and the accused's previous pending cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case