Rajitha vs District Revenue Officer (L.A) National Highways, Villupuram — 30/2023

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 64. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNVP010014482023

Evidence

Next Hearing

19th June 2026

Filing Number

197/2023

Filing Date

01-02-2023

Registration No

30/2023

Registration Date

06-02-2023

Court

Principal District Court, Viluppuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 64

Petitioner(s)

Rajitha

Adv. G.P

Magarajan

Sridevi

Dhanakumari

Bathmapriya

Dharmadevi

Rajapriya

Minor Sowmiya

Minor Thilaga

Subthra

Susayna

Cinega

Respondent(s)

District Revenue Officer (L.A) National Highways, Villupuram

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge

20-04-2026

Evidence

16-03-2026

Evidence

12-02-2026

Evidence

29-01-2026

Evidence

15-12-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

18-01-2024
Deposition
28-02-2024
Deposition
06-08-2024
Deposition

In L.A.O.P. No. 30/2023, the Principal Sessions Judge of Villupuram addressed a property dispute involving petitioners Rajitha, Magarajan, and Sridevi against the District Revenue Officer regarding land rights. The court noted that the property (measuring 1744 square meters) has three rightful owners, and examined issues concerning succession rights and competing claims by family members. The judgment referenced a pending petition No. 103/2022 before the Revenue Board, stating that final determination of property rights and successor identification would be decided once that higher petition is resolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In L.A.O.P. No. 30/2023, the Principal Sessions Judge of Villupuram addressed a property dispute involving petitioners Rajitha, Magarajan, and Sridevi against the District Revenue Officer regarding land rights. The court noted that the property (measuring 1744 square meters) has three rightful owners, and examined issues concerning succession rights and competing claims by family members. The judgment referenced a pending petition No. 103/2022 before the Revenue Board, stating that final determination of property rights and successor identification would be decided once that higher petition is resolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Principal District Court, Viluppuram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case