Rajitha vs District Revenue Officer (L.A) National Highways, Villupuram — 30/2023
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 64. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNVP010014482023
Filing Number
197/2023
Filing Date
01-Feb-2023
Registration No
30/2023
Registration Date
06-Feb-2023
Court
Principal District Court, Viluppuram
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rajitha
Adv. G.P
-
2.Magarajan
-
3.Sridevi
-
4.Dhanakumari
-
5.Bathmapriya
-
6.Dharmadevi
-
7.Rajapriya
-
8.Minor Sowmiya
-
9.Minor Thilaga
-
10.Subthra
-
11.Susayna
-
12.Cinega
Respondent(s)
-
1.District Revenue Officer (L.A) National Highways, Villupuram
Case History
-
19-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-Apr-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
15-Dec-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
26-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
25-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
10-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
08-Aug-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
28-Jul-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
24-Jun-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
24-Apr-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
28-Mar-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
06-Mar-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
07-Feb-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
10-Jan-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
06-Dec-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
16-Nov-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
07-Nov-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
18-Oct-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
26-Sep-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
19-Sep-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
11-Sep-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
21-Aug-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
06-Aug-2024
DepositionView PDF
In L.A.O.P. No. 30/2023, the Principal Sessions Judge of Villupuram addressed a property dispute involving petitioners Rajitha, Magarajan, and Sridevi against the District Revenue Officer regarding land rights. The court noted that the property (measuring 1744 square meters) has three rightful owners, and examined issues concerning succession rights and competing claims by family members. The judgment referenced a pending petition No. 103/2022 before the Revenue Board, stating that final determination of property rights and successor identification would be decided once that higher petition is resolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Aug-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
26-Jul-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
04-Jul-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
13-Jun-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
08-Apr-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge
-
20-Mar-2024
Appearance
Principal District Judge
-
28-Feb-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
28-Feb-2024
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
18-Jan-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
18-Jan-2024
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
21-Dec-2023
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
22-Nov-2023
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
18-Oct-2023
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
26-Sep-2023
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
25-Aug-2023
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
01-Aug-2023
Enquiry
Principal District Judge
-
12-Jul-2023
Counter
Principal District Judge
-
15-Jun-2023
Appearance
Principal District Judge
-
13-Apr-2023
Appearance
Principal District Judge
-
17-Mar-2023
Appearance
Principal District Judge
-
06-Feb-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Feb-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 30/2023
In L.A.O.P. No. 30/2023, the Principal Sessions Judge of Villupuram addressed a property dispute involving petitioners Rajitha, Magarajan, and Sridevi against the District Revenue Officer regarding land rights. The court noted that the property (measuring 1744 square meters) has three rightful owners, and examined issues concerning succession rights and competing claims by family members. The judgment referenced a pending petition No. 103/2022 before the Revenue Board, stating that final determination of property rights and successor identification would be decided once that higher petition is resolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts