Ebram sha vs SHO Thiruvennainallur P.S — 945/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVP010013692026

Filing Number

1139/2026

Filing Date

04-Mar-2026

Registration No

945/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Viluppuram

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ebram sha

    Adv. Muralitharan.M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHO (Station House Officer) Thiruvennainallur P.S

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    BailView PDF

    Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Villupuram granted bail to Ebram Sha, accused of illegally transporting banned tobacco products worth Rs. 39,360, under sections 123, 274, 275 of BNS and section 24(1) of COTPA Act, 2003. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs. 2,000 non-refundable deposit to the Cancer Institute, execution of a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties (one blood relative), daily police attendance for 30 days, and prohibitions against committing similar offences, absconding, or tampering with evidence/witnesses, considering the 15 days custody already served and absence of prior criminal records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 945/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal Sessions Judge, Villupuram granted bail to Ebram Sha, accused of illegally transporting banned tobacco products worth Rs. 39,360, under sections 123, 274, 275 of BNS and section 24(1) of COTPA Act, 2003. The court imposed stringent conditions including a Rs. 2,000 non-refundable deposit to the Cancer Institute, execution of a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties (one blood relative), daily police attendance for 30 days, and prohibitions against committing similar offences, absconding, or tampering with evidence/witnesses, considering the 15 days custody already served and absence of prior criminal records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case