Manimaran vs P.Mujthulakshmi — 100018/2017

Case under The Tamil Nadu Regulation of Rights and Responsibilities of Landlords and Tenants Act, 2017 Section 37(2). Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit (Title)

CNR: TNVP010008602017

IA Pending

Next Hearing

16th June 2026

Filing Number

100638/2017

Filing Date

28-04-2017

Registration No

100018/2017

Registration Date

28-04-2017

Court

Principal District Court, Viluppuram

Judge

18-Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court)

Acts & Sections

THE TAMIL NADU REGULATION OF RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF LANDLORDS AND TENANTS ACT, 2017 Section 37(2)

Petitioner(s)

Manimaran

Adv. Arokiya Maniraj

Respondent(s)

P.Mujthulakshmi

Mr.Dhanasekaran

C.Ayyanar

Hearing History

Judge: 18-Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court)

08-06-2026

IA Pending

03-06-2026

Steps

24-04-2026

Steps

16-03-2026

IA Pending

02-03-2026

IA Pending

Interim Orders

05-10-2021
Deposition

Case Summary: 100018/2017 Case: IA 3/2020 in O.S.No.18/2017 Petitioner: Manimaran Respondents: P. Mujthulakshmi, Mr. Dhanasekaran, C. Ayyanar Date: 05.10.2021 The court heard arguments regarding disputed claims and evidence presented by the petitioner concerning property or contractual matters. The court found merit in the petitioner's contentions regarding certain documents and disputes raised, and directed that the respondent's objections be addressed in accordance with proper legal procedure. The matter was partially allowed with directions for further proceedings on specific issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 100018/2017 Case: IA 3/2020 in O.S.No.18/2017 Petitioner: Manimaran Respondents: P. Mujthulakshmi, Mr. Dhanasekaran, C. Ayyanar Date: 05.10.2021 The court heard arguments regarding disputed claims and evidence presented by the petitioner concerning property or contractual matters. The court found merit in the petitioner's contentions regarding certain documents and disputes raised, and directed that the respondent's objections be addressed in accordance with proper legal procedure. The matter was partially allowed with directions for further proceedings on specific issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Viluppuram All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case