SHO West Police Station Villupuram vs Mohammed Asarudeen — 35/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 274, 275, 123. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 18th March 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNVP010004982026
Filing Number
410/2026
Filing Date
21-01-2026
Registration No
35/2026
Registration Date
21-01-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Viluppuram
Judge
18-Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court)
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
176
Police Station
Villupuram West P.S
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHO (Station House Officer) West Police Station Villupuram
Adv. Subramanian. T.S.
Respondent(s)
Mohammed Asarudeen
Raja
Hearing History
Judge: 18-Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court)
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 16-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 12-03-2026 | Trial |
| 10-03-2026 | Trial |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 35/2026 Summary Court: Additional District & Sessions Judge (FTC), Villupuram Petitioner: SHO West Police Station, Villupuram Respondents: Mohammed Asarudeen (Age 28) and Raja (Age 23) Court's Decision The court found insufficient evidence to prove charges under BNS Sections 274, 275, 123 read with 24(1), 6(b) COTPA Act against the accused. Due to credibility issues with prosecution witnesses and doubts about investigation procedures, the accused were acquitted under Section 258(1) BNSS and released. The court ruled that charges of illegal tobacco/gutkha product trafficking were not proven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case 35/2026 Summary Court: Additional District & Sessions Judge (FTC), Villupuram Petitioner: SHO West Police Station, Villupuram Respondents: Mohammed Asarudeen (Age 28) and Raja (Age 23) Court's Decision The court found insufficient evidence to prove charges under BNS Sections 274, 275, 123 read with 24(1), 6(b) COTPA Act against the accused. Due to credibility issues with prosecution witnesses and doubts about investigation procedures, the accused were acquitted under Section 258(1) BNSS and released. The court ruled that charges of illegal tobacco/gutkha product trafficking were not proven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts