AKILA VICTOR vs AMUDHA — 2389/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVL240047982025

Filing Number

4797/2025

Filing Date

11-Sep-2025

Registration No

2389/2025

Registration Date

11-Sep-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Katpadi

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate,Katpadi

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AKILA VICTOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AMUDHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the petition filed against Police Inspector Mrs. Amutha for allegedly failing to register an FIR. The court held that no prima facie case was established due to lack of documentary evidence and that prior sanction from the executive authority is mandatory before taking cognizance against government servants, citing Supreme Court precedent protecting public servants acting in good faith. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate,Katpadi

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate,Katpadi

  5. 30-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate,Katpadi

  6. 19-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate,Katpadi

  7. 28-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate,Katpadi

  8. 07-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    Judicial Magistrate,Katpadi

  9. 11-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 11-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2389/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the petition filed against Police Inspector Mrs. Amutha for allegedly failing to register an FIR. The court held that no prima facie case was established due to lack of documentary evidence and that prior sanction from the executive authority is mandatory before taking cognizance against government servants, citing Supreme Court precedent protecting public servants acting in good faith. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case