ASHA vs ARUL — 9/2023
Case under Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th March 2026.
DVC - Domestic Violence Case
CNR: TNVL240036562023
Filing Number
3656/2023
Filing Date
08-06-2023
Registration No
9/2023
Registration Date
08-06-2023
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Katpadi
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate,Katpadi
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ASHA
Adv. SANKAR
Respondent(s)
ARUL
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate,Katpadi
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-02-2026 | Judgement |
| 20-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 30-01-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court at Katpadi partially allowed a domestic violence petition filed by Asha against her ex-husband Arul under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court rejected her claim for Rs. 40 lakh compensation related to property sale proceeds, holding that property disputes cannot be converted into domestic violence cases and must be resolved through civil courts. However, the court granted her maintenance of Rs. 5,000 per month from the filing date and directed return of her personal belongings (cell phone and camera lens), recognizing her entitlement to post-divorce maintenance as she remains unmarried and unable to support herself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court at Katpadi partially allowed a domestic violence petition filed by Asha against her ex-husband Arul under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court rejected her claim for Rs. 40 lakh compensation related to property sale proceeds, holding that property disputes cannot be converted into domestic violence cases and must be resolved through civil courts. However, the court granted her maintenance of Rs. 5,000 per month from the filing date and directed return of her personal belongings (cell phone and camera lens), recognizing her entitlement to post-divorce maintenance as she remains unmarried and unable to support herself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts