SI OF POLICE THIRUVALAM PS vs VIJAYAKUMAR Advocate - KARTHIKEYAN R — 354/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVL240004762026

Filing Number

476/2026

Filing Date

04-Mar-2026

Registration No

354/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Katpadi

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate,Katpadi

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SI OF POLICE THIRUVALAM PS (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIJAYAKUMAR Advocate - KARTHIKEYAN R

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate Court in Kattupakkam ordered the return of a Honda Unicorn two-wheeler (Registration: TN23 DH 1161) to the petitioner Vijayakumar, seized in criminal case no. 162/2025 under sections 7(5) and 20(2) of the COTP Act, subject to strict conditions including furnishing a surety bond of Rs. 1,00,000, providing photographs and documents, and undertaking not to sell, mortgage, or transfer the vehicle until the case concludes. The court imposed these conditions to ensure the vehicle's availability for trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate,Katpadi

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate,Katpadi

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 354/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate Court in Kattupakkam ordered the return of a Honda Unicorn two-wheeler (Registration: TN23 DH 1161) to the petitioner Vijayakumar, seized in criminal case no. 162/2025 under sections 7(5) and 20(2) of the COTP Act, subject to strict conditions including furnishing a surety bond of Rs. 1,00,000, providing photographs and documents, and undertaking not to sell, mortgage, or transfer the vehicle until the case concludes. The court imposed these conditions to ensure the vehicle's availability for trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case