SI OF POLICE K.V.KUPPAM PS vs CHIDAMBARAM Advocate - ASHOK S — 352/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVL240004742026

Filing Number

474/2026

Filing Date

04-Mar-2026

Registration No

352/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Katpadi

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate,Katpadi

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SI OF POLICE K.V.KUPPAM PS (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHIDAMBARAM Advocate - ASHOK S

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Kattapadi rejected the accused's bail petition in Criminal Case No. 352/2026 dated March 12, 2026. The accused was charged under BNS sections 303(2), 329(4), 351(2), 62, and 74 for allegedly attempting to snatch a gold chain from a woman's neck. The court found the bail rejection order by police justified, reasoning that releasing the accused on bail would likely result in further criminal activity and potential witness intimidation, thereby prejudicing the case investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate,Katpadi

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate,Katpadi

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate,Katpadi

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 04-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 352/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court, Kattapadi rejected the accused's bail petition in Criminal Case No. 352/2026 dated March 12, 2026. The accused was charged under BNS sections 303(2), 329(4), 351(2), 62, and 74 for allegedly attempting to snatch a gold chain from a woman's neck. The court found the bail rejection order by police justified, reasoning that releasing the accused on bail would likely result in further criminal activity and potential witness intimidation, thereby prejudicing the case investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case