SI OF POLICE KATPADI vs DEVARAJ Advocate - NANDEES KUMAR — 318/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVL240004212026

Filing Number

421/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

318/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Katpadi

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate,Katpadi

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SI OF POLICE KATPADI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEVARAJ Advocate - NANDEES KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The court dismissed the accused Thevaraja's bail petition in Criminal Case No. 318/2026, finding that releasing him on bail would pose a risk of repetition of similar offenses and could hamper the ongoing investigation. The court upheld the strict bail conditions imposed by the lower court, noting that the charges under ITP Act sections 3(1), 4(2)(C), 5(1)(a) and BNS 351(3) were serious, and the accused's release could allow him to tamper with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate,Katpadi

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate,Katpadi

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate,Katpadi

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 318/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the accused Thevaraja's bail petition in Criminal Case No. 318/2026, finding that releasing him on bail would pose a risk of repetition of similar offenses and could hamper the ongoing investigation. The court upheld the strict bail conditions imposed by the lower court, noting that the charges under ITP Act sections 3(1), 4(2)(C), 5(1)(a) and BNS 351(3) were serious, and the accused's release could allow him to tamper with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case