Vijayan vs Devendiran and 2 Others Advocate - GOVERTHANAN R — 105/2016

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 27(c). Disposed: Uncontested--Transfer Cases to Other Court on 24th March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNVL230001532016

Case disposed

Filing Number

105/2016

Filing Date

22-08-2016

Registration No

105/2016

Registration Date

22-08-2016

Court

District Munsif Court, Katpadi

Judge

1-District Munsif,Katpadi

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Transfer Cases to Other Court

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

Vijayan

Adv. VIJAYABASKAR G

Respondent(s)

Devendiran and 2 Others Advocate - GOVERTHANAN R

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif,Katpadi

24-03-2026

Disposed

16-02-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

20-01-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

06-01-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

02-12-2025

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Interim Orders

24-08-2023
Copy of Judgment

Case 105/2016 - Summary The District Munsif Court, Katpadi, allowed Vijayan's petition seeking assistance from the Assistant Director of Survey to help the court-appointed Advocate Commissioner complete property measurements in his suit against Devendiran and two others. The Advocate Commissioner had been unable to complete the inspection due to missing survey stones (boundary markers) despite two prior inspection attempts in February and June 2022. The court found that obtaining surveyor assistance was necessary to fulfill the purpose of the commission and would cause no prejudice to the defendants, who failed to file opposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 105/2016 - Summary The District Munsif Court, Katpadi, allowed Vijayan's petition seeking assistance from the Assistant Director of Survey to help the court-appointed Advocate Commissioner complete property measurements in his suit against Devendiran and two others. The Advocate Commissioner had been unable to complete the inspection due to missing survey stones (boundary markers) despite two prior inspection attempts in February and June 2022. The court found that obtaining surveyor assistance was necessary to fulfill the purpose of the commission and would cause no prejudice to the defendants, who failed to file opposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Katpadi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case