Subramani vs Subramaniam Advocate - JAGANNATHAN D — 49/2015
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 27(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVL230001502015
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
49/2015
Filing Date
18-03-2015
Registration No
49/2015
Registration Date
18-03-2015
Court
District Munsif Court, Katpadi
Judge
1-District Munsif,Katpadi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Subramani
Adv. ARAVIND M
Respondent(s)
Subramaniam Advocate - JAGANNATHAN D
D LAKSHMANAN
Adv. CHANDRAMOULI M
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif,Katpadi
Evidence
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 15-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 06-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 13-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 05-03-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary of OS.No. 49/2015 This document records the deposition of witness PW5 in a civil suit before the District Munsif Court, Katpadi, Vellore District. PW5 testified regarding family background, property-related matters concerning a father's property (thavai sozhuthu) transferred to her uncles who served in the military, and a 1988 land lease arrangement worth Rs. 9,000. During cross-examination, the witness clarified relationships between the plaintiff and defendants, family income sources, and denied bias against the first defendant despite potential conflicts. The court recorded the witness's responses to questions challenging the reliability and consistency of her testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of OS.No. 49/2015 This document records the deposition of witness PW5 in a civil suit before the District Munsif Court, Katpadi, Vellore District. PW5 testified regarding family background, property-related matters concerning a father's property (thavai sozhuthu) transferred to her uncles who served in the military, and a 1988 land lease arrangement worth Rs. 9,000. During cross-examination, the witness clarified relationships between the plaintiff and defendants, family income sources, and denied bias against the first defendant despite potential conflicts. The court recorded the witness's responses to questions challenging the reliability and consistency of her testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts