ARULMIGU KAILASANADAR AND KOTTAIAMMAN TEMPLES, REP.BY ITS K.R.MAYURANATHA GURUKKA vs GANESAN K Advocate - KALAIMANI G — 77/2018
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 27(C),27(C). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVL230001112018
Next Hearing
02nd April 2026
Filing Number
77/2018
Filing Date
26-07-2018
Registration No
77/2018
Registration Date
26-07-2018
Court
District Munsif Court, Katpadi
Judge
1-District Munsif,Katpadi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ARULMIGU KAILASANADAR AND KOTTAIAMMAN TEMPLES, REP.BY ITS K.R.MAYURANATHA GURUKKA
Adv. KULOTHUNGAN M
Respondent(s)
GANESAN K Advocate - KALAIMANI G
SWAMINATHAN R
Adv. KALAIMANI G
DEVARAJ
Adv. KALAIMANI G
THE JOINT COMMISSIONER
Adv. SELVARAJ T N K
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif,Katpadi
Trial
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
Amendment
Amendment
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Trial |
| 26-02-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 23-02-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 10-02-2026 | Amendment |
| 07-02-2026 | Amendment |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed by Arulmigu Kailasanadar and Kottaimman Temples to implead the newly elected Dharmakartha and Nattamai as 5th and 6th defendants (in place of the deceased original 1st and 2nd defendants) has been allowed. The court found the proposed parties are necessary for proper adjudication of the suit seeking permanent and mandatory injunctions regarding unauthorized construction on temple property, and effective judgment cannot be passed without them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed by Arulmigu Kailasanadar and Kottaimman Temples to implead the newly elected Dharmakartha and Nattamai as 5th and 6th defendants (in place of the deceased original 1st and 2nd defendants) has been allowed. The court found the proposed parties are necessary for proper adjudication of the suit seeking permanent and mandatory injunctions regarding unauthorized construction on temple property, and effective judgment cannot be passed without them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts