C.VASANTHA vs K.KANTHAMMAL Advocate - G.LATHA — 62/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(b),25(d). Status: IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.

IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending Next hearing 30-Mar-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNVL230001072023

Filing Number

133/2023

Filing Date

26-Apr-2023

Registration No

62/2023

Registration Date

05-Jun-2023

Court

District Munsif Court, Katpadi

Judge

1-District Munsif,Katpadi

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(b),25(d)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.C.VASANTHA

    Adv. BALAJI P G

  2. 2.C.GEETHA

    Adv. BALAJI P G

  3. 3.C.ELANGOVAN

    Adv. BALAJI P G

  4. 4.C.SUSEELA

    Adv. BALAJI P G

  5. 5.C.AMUTHA

    Adv. BALAJI P G

  6. 6.C.THAMIZHSELVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.K.KANTHAMMAL Advocate - G.LATHA

  2. 2.C.BOOPALAN

    Adv. RAJENDHRAN P

  3. 3.B.CHINNA PONNU

    Adv. RAJENDRAN P

  4. 4.RAMESH BABU

    Adv. DHAYANITHI S

  5. 5.THE SUB-REGISTRAR, KATPADI TOWN

    Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER

Case History

  1. 30-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  5. 28-Jan-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  6. 13-Dec-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  7. 09-Dec-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  8. 19-Nov-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  9. 22-Oct-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  10. 20-Sep-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  11. 16-Sep-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  12. 22-Aug-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  13. 29-Jul-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  14. 25-Jun-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  15. 06-Jun-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  16. 21-Mar-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  17. 14-Feb-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  18. 20-Dec-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  19. 08-Nov-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  20. 27-Sep-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  21. 14-Aug-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  22. 22-Jul-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  23. 07-Jun-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  24. 01-Apr-2024

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  25. 01-Apr-2024

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: The petition filed by the plaintiffs to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to inspect the disputed properties and prepare a survey report has been dismissed. The District Munsif Court held that the main issue in the suit—whether the plaintiffs are absolute owners of the properties—must be decided based on evidence provided by the parties themselves, not through a Commissioner's inspection. The court found that appointing a Commissioner to gather evidence would be improper under Order 26 Rule 9 of the CPC, and no clarification of disputed facts was necessary at this preliminary stage before issues were even framed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  26. 01-Apr-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  27. 25-Mar-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  28. 20-Mar-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  29. 15-Mar-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  30. 28-Feb-2024

    Orders

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  31. 29-Jan-2024

    Orders

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  32. 04-Jan-2024

    Orders

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  33. 08-Dec-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  34. 06-Nov-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  35. 12-Oct-2023

    Enquiry

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  36. 26-Sep-2023

    IA Pending

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  37. 15-Sep-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  38. 12-Sep-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  39. 08-Aug-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  40. 10-Jul-2023

    Service Pending-Notice

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  41. 05-Jun-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 26-Apr-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 62/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed by the plaintiffs to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to inspect the disputed properties and prepare a survey report has been dismissed. The District Munsif Court held that the main issue in the suit—whether the plaintiffs are absolute owners of the properties—must be decided based on evidence provided by the parties themselves, not through a Commissioner's inspection. The court found that appointing a Commissioner to gather evidence would be improper under Order 26 Rule 9 of the CPC, and no clarification of disputed facts was necessary at this preliminary stage before issues were even framed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case