MANJULA vs MOORTHY Advocate - GUNASEKARAN S — 212/2012
Disposed: Uncontested--Transfer Cases to Other Court on 24th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVL230000742012
Filing Number
212/2012
Filing Date
02-11-2012
Registration No
212/2012
Registration Date
02-11-2012
Court
District Munsif Court, Katpadi
Judge
1-District Munsif,Katpadi
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Transfer Cases to Other Court
Petitioner(s)
MANJULA
Adv. NEPOLEAN R
Respondent(s)
MOORTHY Advocate - GUNASEKARAN S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif,Katpadi
Disposed
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 03-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 20-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 07-01-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
This document is a deposition of a witness (DW1) in a property/succession dispute case rather than a final court judgment. The witness, examined on July 10, 2025, provided testimony regarding a will allegedly created by Murukkesana Mandhiri around 2007-2008 when he was approximately 70-75 years old. The witness testified that the testator was of sound mind and lived approximately 10 years after executing the will, and clarified various details about property ownership, family relationships, and the will's execution. However, the document contains only cross-examination responses with limited factual clarity rather than a formal court decision on the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a deposition of a witness (DW1) in a property/succession dispute case rather than a final court judgment. The witness, examined on July 10, 2025, provided testimony regarding a will allegedly created by Murukkesana Mandhiri around 2007-2008 when he was approximately 70-75 years old. The witness testified that the testator was of sound mind and lived approximately 10 years after executing the will, and clarified various details about property ownership, family relationships, and the will's execution. However, the document contains only cross-examination responses with limited factual clarity rather than a formal court decision on the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts