T.Deivanayagam vs R.Veeravaghu Advocate - SIVAKUMAR T M — 156/2012
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(a),27(c). Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVL230000692012
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
156/2012
Filing Date
30-07-2012
Registration No
156/2012
Registration Date
10-08-2012
Court
District Munsif Court, Katpadi
Judge
1-District Munsif,Katpadi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
T.Deivanayagam
Adv. SALEMURUGAN K U
SELVANAYAGAM
Adv. SALEMURUGAN K U
NAGALAKSHMI
Adv. SALEMURUGAN K U
SENTHIL NATHAN
Adv. SALEMURUGAN K U
LOGANAYAGI
Adv. SALEMURUGAN K U
ESWARI
Adv. SALEMURUGAN K U
GAYATHRI DEVI
Adv. SALEMURUGAN K U
Respondent(s)
R.Veeravaghu Advocate - SIVAKUMAR T M
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif,Katpadi
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 20-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 15-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 06-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 27-03-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
This document is a deposition transcript (examination of PW1 witness) in a property dispute case OS.No.156/2012 before the District Munsif Court, Katpadi, Vellore District. The witness testified regarding a disputed property allegedly purchased in 1999 from one Thangaraj. Key issues included: whether the witness had title to the property when constructing a building (2003-2007), discrepancies in the witness's account regarding when he learned of alleged fraud by Thangaraj (2003 vs. 2007), lack of tax receipts for construction during 2003-2007 period, and conflicting statements about property dimensions and construction timeline. The deposition concluded with cross-examination rejecting various aspects of the witness's testimony. No final judgment or order on the petition itself is contained in this document—only the witness examination record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a deposition transcript (examination of PW1 witness) in a property dispute case OS.No.156/2012 before the District Munsif Court, Katpadi, Vellore District. The witness testified regarding a disputed property allegedly purchased in 1999 from one Thangaraj. Key issues included: whether the witness had title to the property when constructing a building (2003-2007), discrepancies in the witness's account regarding when he learned of alleged fraud by Thangaraj (2003 vs. 2007), lack of tax receipts for construction during 2003-2007 period, and conflicting statements about property dimensions and construction timeline. The deposition concluded with cross-examination rejecting various aspects of the witness's testimony. No final judgment or order on the petition itself is contained in this document—only the witness examination record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts