Saraswathi and 3 Others vs Subramani and 2 Others Advocate - THUKKARAM V — 152/2014
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(b). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVL230000612014
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
Filing Number
152/2014
Filing Date
13-10-2014
Registration No
152/2014
Registration Date
13-10-2014
Court
District Munsif Court, Katpadi
Judge
1-District Munsif,Katpadi
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Saraswathi and 3 Others
Adv. SELVARAJU V P
Respondent(s)
Subramani and 2 Others Advocate - THUKKARAM V
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif,Katpadi
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 11-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 06-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 27-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 19-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed by the plaintiffs to set aside the abatement of the suit against the 1st defendant (who died on 09.10.2021) and to implead his legal heirs has been allowed. The court found that the legal heirs are necessary and proper parties to continue the suit for declaration and permanent injunction, and accepted the plaintiffs' reasons for filing the petition beyond the prescribed time. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed by the plaintiffs to set aside the abatement of the suit against the 1st defendant (who died on 09.10.2021) and to implead his legal heirs has been allowed. The court found that the legal heirs are necessary and proper parties to continue the suit for declaration and permanent injunction, and accepted the plaintiffs' reasons for filing the petition beyond the prescribed time. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts