GOVINDHA SAMY vs HARIDOSS — 22/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25 (d), 27 (C). Disposed: Uncontested--Transfer Cases to Other Court on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNVL230000462024

Filing Number

46/2024

Filing Date

18-Mar-2024

Registration No

22/2024

Registration Date

18-Mar-2024

Court

District Munsif Court, Katpadi

Judge

1-District Munsif,Katpadi

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Transfer Cases to Other Court

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 25 (d), 27 (C)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVINDHA SAMY

    Adv. KANNAIYAN T S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HARIDOSS

  2. 2.SAVITHIRI AMMAL

    Adv. KANNAIYAN T S

  3. 3.VENKATACHALAPATHY ALIAS VENKATESAN

    Adv. KANNAIYAN T S

  4. 4.RAJAKUMARI

    Adv. KANNAIYAN T S

  5. 5.ARUN

    Adv. KANNAIYAN T S

  6. 6.SINDU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  6. 04-Feb-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  7. 29-Jan-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  8. 21-Jan-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  9. 19-Dec-2025

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  10. 08-Dec-2025

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  11. 03-Dec-2025

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  12. 25-Nov-2025

    Judgement

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  13. 14-Nov-2025

    Judgement

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  14. 31-Oct-2025

    Judgement

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  15. 22-Sep-2025

    Judgement

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  16. 03-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  17. 20-Aug-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  18. 20-Aug-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    This document is a witness deposition record (PW2) from OS No. 22/2024 in the District Munsif Court, Katpadi, Vellore District, dated August 20, 2025. The witness, a 53-year-old woman who is the plaintiff's daughter, affirmed her statement under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, and testified that she has direct knowledge of the case facts, having read and understood the documents involved, none of which were marked as exhibits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  19. 20-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  20. 03-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  21. 19-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  22. 15-Apr-2025

    Compliance

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  23. 10-Mar-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  24. 20-Feb-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  25. 17-Feb-2025

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  26. 23-Jan-2025

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  27. 20-Nov-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  28. 15-Oct-2024

    Batta

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  29. 11-Sep-2024

    Batta

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  30. 29-Jul-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  31. 15-Jun-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  32. 19-Apr-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif,Katpadi

  33. 18-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 18-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 22/2024

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a witness deposition record (PW2) from OS No. 22/2024 in the District Munsif Court, Katpadi, Vellore District, dated August 20, 2025. The witness, a 53-year-old woman who is the plaintiff's daughter, affirmed her statement under the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, and testified that she has direct knowledge of the case facts, having read and understood the documents involved, none of which were marked as exhibits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case