SAROJA C vs JAYA C Advocate - KARTHIKEYAN A — 19/2018

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(A)25(B). Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNVL230000292018

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Next Hearing

05th June 2026

Filing Number

19/2018

Filing Date

12-02-2018

Registration No

19/2018

Registration Date

15-02-2018

Court

District Munsif Court, Katpadi

Judge

1-District Munsif,Katpadi

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(A)25(B)

Petitioner(s)

SAROJA C

Adv. BABU S

JAYARAMAN C

Adv. BABU S

RAVICHANDRAN

Adv. BABU S

Respondent(s)

JAYA C Advocate - KARTHIKEYAN A

CHANDRA P

Adv. CHANDRAMOULI M

VIJAYALAKSHMI K

Adv. CHANDRAMOULI M

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif,Katpadi

29-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

22-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

08-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

01-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

25-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Interim Orders

21-10-2024
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: OS 19/2018 Court: District Munsif, Katpadi, Vellore District Date: 21 October 2024 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The court permitted plaintiffs Saroja C, Jayaraman C, and Ravichandran to file six photographs and one compact disc as evidence, subject to compliance with Section 65(B) of the Indian Evidence Act and proof of relevancy and admissibility. The documents relate to alleged illegal constructions on disputed properties. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS 19/2018 Court: District Munsif, Katpadi, Vellore District Date: 21 October 2024 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The court permitted plaintiffs Saroja C, Jayaraman C, and Ravichandran to file six photographs and one compact disc as evidence, subject to compliance with Section 65(B) of the Indian Evidence Act and proof of relevancy and admissibility. The documents relate to alleged illegal constructions on disputed properties. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Katpadi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case