SI OF POLICE PARADARAMI PS vs VIKRAM — 517/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),115(2),351(3) BNS. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 15-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNVL110089212025

e-Filing Number

15-09-2025

Filing Number

8919/2025

Filing Date

16-Sep-2025

Registration No

517/2025

Registration Date

16-Sep-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Gudiyatham

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

88

Police Station

PARADHARAMI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),115(2),351(3) BNS
Tn Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, 2002 Section 4 OF TNP HW ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SI OF POLICE PARADARAMI PS (Police Station)

    Adv. Sub Inspector of Police

  2. 2.RAMESH

    Adv. Sub Inspector of Police

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIKRAM

  2. 2.RAKESH

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-May-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  3. 19-May-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  4. 08-May-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: 517/2025 Court: Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham, Vellore District Deposition recorded: Witness P.W.1 (Ramesh) testified on 8 May 2026 under oath regarding allegations of assault and loan-related disputes with respondents Vikram and Rakesh. During examination-in-chief, Ramesh alleged the respondents came to his house and assaulted him with a stick. During cross-examination, significant contradictions emerged: Ramesh admitted his daughter-in-law (not he) signed the complaint, acknowledged the complaint date was uncertain (Sept-Oct 2025), and retracted claims about Rs. 40 lakh loans owed by his son to Rakesh, admitting he had no concrete evidence despite previous police statements. The witness further admitted potential inconsistencies regarding SC/ST case allegations and acknowledged police investigated at home rather than the station. Status: Witness deposition concluded with substantial credibility issues identified through cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 08-May-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  6. 27-Apr-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  7. 30-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  8. 18-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  9. 16-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  10. 13-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  11. 03-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  12. 02-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  13. 02-Dec-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  14. 16-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 16-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 517/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 517/2025 Court: Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham, Vellore District Deposition recorded: Witness P.W.1 (Ramesh) testified on 8 May 2026 under oath regarding allegations of assault and loan-related disputes with respondents Vikram and Rakesh. During examination-in-chief, Ramesh alleged the respondents came to his house and assaulted him with a stick. During cross-examination, significant contradictions emerged: Ramesh admitted his daughter-in-law (not he) signed the complaint, acknowledged the complaint date was uncertain (Sept-Oct 2025), and retracted claims about Rs. 40 lakh loans owed by his son to Rakesh, admitting he had no concrete evidence despite previous police statements. The witness further admitted potential inconsistencies regarding SC/ST case allegations and acknowledged police investigated at home rather than the station. Status: Witness deposition concluded with substantial credibility issues identified through cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case