State Of Tamil Nadu Represented By Inspector Of Police vs Inbamani — 291/2024
Case under Child Marriage Restraint Act, 1929 Section 9, 10. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNVL110061812024
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
e-Filing Number
09-11-2024
Filing Number
6108/2024
Filing Date
24-12-2024
Registration No
291/2024
Registration Date
24-12-2024
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Gudiyatham
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
FIR Details
FIR Number
03
Police Station
AWPS GUDIYATHAM
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of Tamil Nadu Represented By Inspector Of Police
Adv. Inspector of Police
Respondent(s)
Inbamani
Panneer
Mythili
Kanchana
Kanmani
Raja
Kavitha
Thamilarasi
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
Evidence
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-04-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 06-04-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 291/2024 Court: Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham, Vellore District Date: 24 November 2025 This document records the witness depositions (P.W.3 Shankar and P.W.4 Shivakumar) in a criminal case involving child marriage allegations. Both witnesses testified that they signed a document approximately 2-3 years prior at police request but claimed no knowledge of the case details. During cross-examination by the respondents' counsel, both witnesses retracted their statements, admitting they had provided false testimony in favor of the respondents. No final judgment or order on the substantive case petition is documented in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 291/2024 Court: Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham, Vellore District Date: 24 November 2025 This document records the witness depositions (P.W.3 Shankar and P.W.4 Shivakumar) in a criminal case involving child marriage allegations. Both witnesses testified that they signed a document approximately 2-3 years prior at police request but claimed no knowledge of the case details. During cross-examination by the respondents' counsel, both witnesses retracted their statements, admitting they had provided false testimony in favor of the respondents. No final judgment or order on the substantive case petition is documented in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts