State Of Tamil Nadu Represented By Inspector Of Police vs Inbamani — 291/2024

Case under Child Marriage Restraint Act, 1929 Section 9, 10. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 09-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNVL110061812024

e-Filing Number

09-11-2024

Filing Number

6108/2024

Filing Date

24-Dec-2024

Registration No

291/2024

Registration Date

24-Dec-2024

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Gudiyatham

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

03

Police Station

AWPS GUDIYATHAM

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Child Marriage Restraint Act, 1929 Section 9, 10

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Of Tamil Nadu Represented By Inspector Of Police

    Adv. Inspector of Police

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inbamani

  2. 2.Panneer

  3. 3.Mythili

  4. 4.Kanchana

  5. 5.Kanmani

  6. 6.Raja

  7. 7.Kavitha

  8. 8.Thamilarasi

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-May-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  8. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  9. 24-Nov-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: 291/2024 Court: Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham, Vellore District Date: 24 November 2025 This document records the witness depositions (P.W.3 Shankar and P.W.4 Shivakumar) in a criminal case involving child marriage allegations. Both witnesses testified that they signed a document approximately 2-3 years prior at police request but claimed no knowledge of the case details. During cross-examination by the respondents' counsel, both witnesses retracted their statements, admitting they had provided false testimony in favor of the respondents. No final judgment or order on the substantive case petition is documented in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 24-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  11. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  12. 03-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  13. 14-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  14. 11-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  15. 11-Jul-2025

    Restored

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  16. 11-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  17. 11-Jul-2025

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  18. 01-Jul-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  19. 01-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  20. 26-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  21. 17-May-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  22. 07-May-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  23. 16-Apr-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  24. 13-Feb-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  25. 28-Jan-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  26. 21-Jan-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham

  27. 24-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 24-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 291/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 291/2024 Court: Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham, Vellore District Date: 24 November 2025 This document records the witness depositions (P.W.3 Shankar and P.W.4 Shivakumar) in a criminal case involving child marriage allegations. Both witnesses testified that they signed a document approximately 2-3 years prior at police request but claimed no knowledge of the case details. During cross-examination by the respondents' counsel, both witnesses retracted their statements, admitting they had provided false testimony in favor of the respondents. No final judgment or order on the substantive case petition is documented in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case