MADHAN BABU vs RENUGA — 1493/2023
Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Status: For further Proceedings. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNVL110017782023
Filing Number
1778/2023
Filing Date
07-Mar-2023
Registration No
1493/2023
Registration Date
07-Mar-2023
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Gudiyatham
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
Last updated 25-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MADHAN BABU
Adv. MADAVAN R
Respondent(s)
-
1.RENUGA
Case History
-
28-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
For further Proceedings
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
06-Feb-2026
Counter
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
12-Dec-2025
Orders
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
18-Nov-2025
Orders
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
06-Oct-2025
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Court Order Summary Petition Allowed with Conditions The Judicial Magistrate Court at Gudiyattam allowed the petitioner's petition to condone a 294-day delay in filing a set-aside petition against an ex-parte order in a maintenance case. The court found that granting the petitioner another opportunity to present his case would serve the interests of justice and prevent irreparable loss, taking a liberal approach as endorsed by the Apex Court. However, the petitioner was ordered to pay Rs. 10,000 as costs to the respondents as compensation for the hardship caused by the delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Oct-2025
Restored
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
06-Oct-2025
Orders
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
06-Oct-2025
Orders
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
06-Oct-2025
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
22-Sep-2025
Orders
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
08-Sep-2025
Orders
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
01-Sep-2025
Orders
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
29-Aug-2025
Orders
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
28-Aug-2025
Orders
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
11-Aug-2025
Enquiry
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
07-Aug-2025
Enquiry
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
27-Jun-2025
Enquiry
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
16-Jun-2025
Enquiry
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
09-Jun-2025
Enquiry
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
02-Jun-2025
Counter
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
28-May-2025
Counter
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
05-Mar-2025
Counter
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
06-Dec-2024
Counter
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
27-Sep-2024
Counter
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
13-Aug-2024
Counter
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
16-Jul-2024
Counter
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
28-Jun-2024
Counter
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
13-Jun-2024
Counter
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
17-May-2024
Counter
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
21-Feb-2024
Counter
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
05-Jan-2024
Counter
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
09-Oct-2023
Counter
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
21-Sep-2023
Counter
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
14-Jul-2023
Counter
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
26-May-2023
Counter
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
28-Apr-2023
Counter
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
06-Apr-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham
-
07-Mar-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 1493/2023
Court Order Summary Petition Allowed with Conditions The Judicial Magistrate Court at Gudiyattam allowed the petitioner's petition to condone a 294-day delay in filing a set-aside petition against an ex-parte order in a maintenance case. The court found that granting the petitioner another opportunity to present his case would serve the interests of justice and prevent irreparable loss, taking a liberal approach as endorsed by the Apex Court. However, the petitioner was ordered to pay Rs. 10,000 as costs to the respondents as compensation for the hardship caused by the delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts