SATHIYAMOORTHI M K vs VENKATESA CHETTIYAR Advocate - GUNASEKARAN S — 54/2019

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21r32(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

EP - Execution Petition

CNR: TNVL100003242019

Evidence

Next Hearing

09th June 2026

Filing Number

403/2019

Filing Date

21-11-2019

Registration No

54/2019

Registration Date

07-12-2019

Court

District Munsif Court, Gudiyatham

Judge

2-District Munsif, Gudiyatham

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 21r32(2)

Petitioner(s)

SATHIYAMOORTHI M K

Adv. BOOPATHI K M

Respondent(s)

VENKATESA CHETTIYAR Advocate - GUNASEKARAN S

LATE. KRISHNAMOORTHY M L

LATE SARASWATHIAMMAL

LATE PANGAJAMMAL

LATE SATHIYAVATHI

PADMAVATHI

MADHUBALA

GAJENDIRAN M

Adv. GUNASEKARAN S

RAGHUPATHI R

KAMALANATHAN R

RAMALINGA M

BALAKRISHNAN M

SRIDHAR K R

SRIHARI K R

SRIKANTH K R

SREEMATHI

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District Munsif, Gudiyatham

30-04-2026

Evidence

17-04-2026

Evidence

30-03-2026

Evidence

13-03-2026

Evidence

27-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

09-01-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: E.A.01/2023 in E.P.54/2019 The District Munsif dismissed the petitioner's application seeking to compel the Inspector of Police, Gudiyattam to testify and impose civil imprisonment for non-compliance with witness summons. The court found that the petitioner failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for examining the police officer, particularly since the petitioner had already filed and marked the relevant police documents (Complaint and CSR copies) as exhibits in the possession delivery case stemming from OS.329/1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: E.A.01/2023 in E.P.54/2019 The District Munsif dismissed the petitioner's application seeking to compel the Inspector of Police, Gudiyattam to testify and impose civil imprisonment for non-compliance with witness summons. The court found that the petitioner failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for examining the police officer, particularly since the petitioner had already filed and marked the relevant police documents (Complaint and CSR copies) as exhibits in the possession delivery case stemming from OS.329/1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Gudiyatham All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case