ARULMIGU PILLAIYAR KOILS AT , REP BY ITS PARAMBARAI DHARMAKARTHAS VENKATESAN AND 2 OTHERS vs DEVARAJ Advocate - DHANDAPANI C — 14/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(C). Status: Additional Issues. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVL100002912020
Next Hearing
08th April 2026
Filing Number
397/2020
Filing Date
21-12-2020
Registration No
14/2021
Registration Date
22-01-2021
Court
District Munsif Court, Gudiyatham
Judge
2-District Munsif, Gudiyatham
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ARULMIGU PILLAIYAR KOILS AT , REP BY ITS PARAMBARAI DHARMAKARTHAS VENKATESAN AND 2 OTHERS
Adv. G.RAMACHANDRAN
Respondent(s)
DEVARAJ Advocate - DHANDAPANI C
SANKAR
Adv. DHANDAPANI C
DHARANI
Adv. DHANDAPANI C
PICHANDI
Adv. DHANDAPANI C
GOVINDARAJ
VINAYAGAM
C.A EKARMBARAM
MEGANATHAN
K.V.SARAVANAN
C.S.EKAMBARAM
PRABU
P.SARAVANAN
T.V.AGOVINDASAMY
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif, Gudiyatham
Additional Issues
Additional Issues
Additional Issues
Additional Issues
Additional Issues
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Additional Issues |
| 06-03-2026 | Additional Issues |
| 20-02-2026 | Additional Issues |
| 12-01-2026 | Additional Issues |
| 03-01-2026 | Additional Issues |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed by Arulmigu Pillayar Temples under Order 7 Rule 14(3) of CPC seeking to file documents late was allowed. The court found the petitioner's reasons for the delay acceptable and determined the documents would be relevant to decide the case on merits. The court allowed the petition in the interest of justice to avoid multiplicity of proceedings, with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed by Arulmigu Pillayar Temples under Order 7 Rule 14(3) of CPC seeking to file documents late was allowed. The court found the petitioner's reasons for the delay acceptable and determined the documents would be relevant to decide the case on merits. The court allowed the petition in the interest of justice to avoid multiplicity of proceedings, with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts