M/S.SHRIRAM CITY FINANCE LTD. GUDIYATTAM vs KARTHIGEYAN.K — 67/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O21R3738. Status: For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

EP - Execution Petition

CNR: TNVL100001932023

For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim

Next Hearing

10th April 2026

Filing Number

218/2023

Filing Date

14-07-2023

Registration No

67/2023

Registration Date

24-07-2023

Court

District Munsif Court, Gudiyatham

Judge

2-District Munsif, Gudiyatham

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O21R3738

Petitioner(s)

M/S.SHRIRAM CITY FINANCE LTD. GUDIYATTAM

Adv. BOOPATHI K M

Respondent(s)

KARTHIGEYAN.K

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District Munsif, Gudiyatham

06-03-2026

For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim

30-01-2026

For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim

19-12-2025

For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim

21-11-2025

For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim

24-10-2025

For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim

Interim Orders

28-10-2024
Copy of Deposition

This document records the deposition of witness P. Priyanka (PW.1) before the District Munsif Court in case E.P.NO. 67/2023 on 28.10.2024. The witness affirmed her testimony in accordance with the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, and the court acknowledged that the deposition was read over and confirmed as correct by her. No substantive court order (bail, dismissal, adjournment, etc.) is issued in this document—it is merely a procedural record of witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document records the deposition of witness P. Priyanka (PW.1) before the District Munsif Court in case E.P.NO. 67/2023 on 28.10.2024. The witness affirmed her testimony in accordance with the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, and the court acknowledged that the deposition was read over and confirmed as correct by her. No substantive court order (bail, dismissal, adjournment, etc.) is issued in this document—it is merely a procedural record of witness examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Gudiyatham All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case