PUSHPA E vs THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR Advocate - LOGANATHAN K — 122/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section or7r1. Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVL100001652023
Next Hearing
06th April 2026
Filing Number
190/2023
Filing Date
14-06-2023
Registration No
122/2023
Registration Date
02-08-2023
Court
District Munsif Court, Gudiyatham
Judge
2-District Munsif, Gudiyatham
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PUSHPA E
Adv. ARUMUGAM J
Respondent(s)
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR Advocate - LOGANATHAN K
THE THASILDHAR
Adv. LOGANATHAN K
THE VILLAGE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
Adv. LOGANATHAN K
THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Adv. LOGANATHAN K
MUNIYAMMA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif, Gudiyatham
Amendment
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Amendment |
| 06-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 05-02-2026 | IA Pending |
| 12-01-2026 | IA Pending |
| 01-12-2025 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary The petition filed by E. Pushpa (plaintiff) to amend the plaint by adding the word "died" after the name of the 5th defendant (Muniyamma) was allowed without cost. The court found that since the 5th defendant died without identifiable heirs and the plaintiff (as sole party) has the right to proceed, the amendment was necessary to avoid multiplicity of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The petition filed by E. Pushpa (plaintiff) to amend the plaint by adding the word "died" after the name of the 5th defendant (Muniyamma) was allowed without cost. The court found that since the 5th defendant died without identifiable heirs and the plaintiff (as sole party) has the right to proceed, the amendment was necessary to avoid multiplicity of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts