DEEJAY FARMS REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTER DAVID JONATHAN LOBO vs GUNASEKARAN Advocate - SRIDHAR K — 116/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVL100001432021
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
Filing Number
187/2021
Filing Date
07-07-2021
Registration No
116/2021
Registration Date
13-07-2021
Court
District Munsif Court, Gudiyatham
Judge
2-District Munsif, Gudiyatham
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DEEJAY FARMS REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTER DAVID JONATHAN LOBO
Adv. BOOPATHI K M
Respondent(s)
GUNASEKARAN Advocate - SRIDHAR K
RAMESH
Adv. MOGANARAJU K
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif, Gudiyatham
Amendment
Amendment
Amendment
IA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Amendment |
| 07-04-2026 | Amendment |
| 13-03-2026 | Amendment |
| 16-02-2026 | IA Pending |
| 03-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Deejay Farms v. Gunasekaran & Ramesh (O.S. 116/2021) Outcome: The petition to amend the plaint was allowed without cost. Deejay Farms sought permission to amend its original plaint for declaration of easement rights over the respondents' property. The court granted the amendment petition, finding it reasonable and timely. The petitioner's original suit claimed right-of-way over the defendants' property (B schedule) to access its own land (A schedule). After an interim injunction was granted, the respondents allegedly closed/blocked the way on 24.10.2022. The advocate commissioner's inspection report confirmed the property's physical condition had changed between inspections. The court held the proposed amendment was consequential to these subsequent changes, within limitation period, and would not prejudice the defendants or alter the suit's fundamental character. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Deejay Farms v. Gunasekaran & Ramesh (O.S. 116/2021) Outcome: The petition to amend the plaint was allowed without cost. Deejay Farms sought permission to amend its original plaint for declaration of easement rights over the respondents' property. The court granted the amendment petition, finding it reasonable and timely. The petitioner's original suit claimed right-of-way over the defendants' property (B schedule) to access its own land (A schedule). After an interim injunction was granted, the respondents allegedly closed/blocked the way on 24.10.2022. The advocate commissioner's inspection report confirmed the property's physical condition had changed between inspections. The court held the proposed amendment was consequential to these subsequent changes, within limitation period, and would not prejudice the defendants or alter the suit's fundamental character. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts