VENKATESAN P vs ARUMUGAM P Advocate - SURESH BABU AL — 200097/2013
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 372AND27COFCFACT. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNVL100001352013
Next Hearing
30th March 2026
Filing Number
200097/2013
Filing Date
29-04-2013
Registration No
200097/2013
Registration Date
29-04-2013
Court
District Munsif Court, Gudiyatham
Judge
2-District Munsif, Gudiyatham
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VENKATESAN P
Adv. ELANGO K
Respondent(s)
ARUMUGAM P Advocate - SURESH BABU AL
RATHINAM
Adv. MUNIRAJULU N
GANGAIYAN
Adv. MUNIRAJULU N
SUNDARARAJAN
Adv. MUNIRAJULU N
VISWANATHAN
Adv. SURESH BABU AL
SIVA S
JAYAPOORNAM
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif, Gudiyatham
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-02-2026 | Enquiry |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The petition filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been allowed. The court directed the 13th defendant to produce evidence and examine witnesses before the 5th defendant does so in the underlying partition suit (O.S. No. 97/2013). The court found that the 13th defendant is supporting the plaintiff's case and denying the settlement deed favoring the 5th defendant, justifying this procedural order to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and serve the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The petition filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been allowed. The court directed the 13th defendant to produce evidence and examine witnesses before the 5th defendant does so in the underlying partition suit (O.S. No. 97/2013). The court found that the 13th defendant is supporting the plaintiff's case and denying the settlement deed favoring the 5th defendant, justifying this procedural order to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and serve the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts