RAMAIYYA vs CHANDIRAN Advocate - MOGANARAJU K — 90/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 22. Status: For further Proceedings. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVL100001342024
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
161/2024
Filing Date
30-07-2024
Registration No
90/2024
Registration Date
01-08-2024
Court
District Munsif Court, Gudiyatham
Judge
2-District Munsif, Gudiyatham
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMAIYYA
Adv. MURUGESAN V
Respondent(s)
CHANDIRAN Advocate - MOGANARAJU K
C.SANGEETHA
Adv. MOGANARAJU K
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif, Gudiyatham
For further Proceedings
Lok Adalat
Lok Adalat
Lok Adalat
Await Reports
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 09-04-2026 | Lok Adalat |
| 14-03-2026 | Lok Adalat |
| 13-03-2026 | Lok Adalat |
| 11-03-2026 | Await Reports |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS 90/2024 Petitioner Ramaiyya (age 62) deposed as PW.1 on 21-03-2025 in this civil suit before the District Munsif, Gudiyattam. The witness testified regarding a loan matter and submitted four documents as evidence: an original debt bond dated 14.10.2023, a legal notice dated 30.05.2024, postal acknowledgements dated 04.06.2024 confirming receipt of the notice by both respondents, and a reply notice dated 10.06.2024. The court admitted all four documents as evidence (marked PW.SA.1 to PW.SA.4) despite objections from respondents' counsel, with the court indicating judgment will follow based on the parties' oral and documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS 90/2024 Petitioner Ramaiyya (age 62) deposed as PW.1 on 21-03-2025 in this civil suit before the District Munsif, Gudiyattam. The witness testified regarding a loan matter and submitted four documents as evidence: an original debt bond dated 14.10.2023, a legal notice dated 30.05.2024, postal acknowledgements dated 04.06.2024 confirming receipt of the notice by both respondents, and a reply notice dated 10.06.2024. The court admitted all four documents as evidence (marked PW.SA.1 to PW.SA.4) despite objections from respondents' counsel, with the court indicating judgment will follow based on the parties' oral and documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts