SALEEM BASHA vs LOGANATHAN D Advocate - RAMACHANDRAN G — 200199/2013
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25bOFCFACT. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNVL100001212013
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
Filing Number
200199/2013
Filing Date
30-08-2013
Registration No
200199/2013
Registration Date
30-08-2013
Court
District Munsif Court, Gudiyatham
Judge
2-District Munsif, Gudiyatham
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SALEEM BASHA
Adv. SURESH BABU A L
SASEEHA KATHOON
Adv. SURESH BABU A L
MOHAMMAD ZAYEEM
Adv. SURESH BABU A L
AZIMA ZAHEENA
Adv. SURESH BABU A L
SARA ZAHEENA
Adv. SURESH BABU A L
MOHAMMED ZABEER
Adv. SURESH BABU A L
Respondent(s)
LOGANATHAN D Advocate - RAMACHANDRAN G
MUNIRATNAM
Adv. RAMACHANDRAN G
BASKAR M N
Adv. RAMACHANDRAN G
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif, Gudiyatham
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 10-02-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Petition Dismissed The District Munsif Court, Gudiyattam dismissed the petition filed by defendants Loganathan and Munirathnam (I.A. 09/2025) seeking permission to file an additional written statement. The court found that the defendants were given nearly 3.5 months (from March 20, 2025 to July 2, 2025) across 19 hearings to file the statement but failed to do so, and subsequently delayed filing this petition by 4.5 months. The court rejected their excuses of illness as unsubstantiated (no medical documents provided) and concluded the petition was filed with intent to prolong the suit, which has been pending since 2013. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Petition Dismissed The District Munsif Court, Gudiyattam dismissed the petition filed by defendants Loganathan and Munirathnam (I.A. 09/2025) seeking permission to file an additional written statement. The court found that the defendants were given nearly 3.5 months (from March 20, 2025 to July 2, 2025) across 19 hearings to file the statement but failed to do so, and subsequently delayed filing this petition by 4.5 months. The court rejected their excuses of illness as unsubstantiated (no medical documents provided) and concluded the petition was filed with intent to prolong the suit, which has been pending since 2013. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts