Jayammal (Died) vs The Tahsildar, Gudiyatham Taluk Vellore District Advocate - LOGANATHAN K — 13/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order 21 rule 32(1). Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED on 13th March 2026.
EP - Execution Petition
CNR: TNVL100001062025
e-Filing Number
08-07-2025
Filing Number
106/2025
Filing Date
11-Jul-2025
Registration No
13/2025
Registration Date
01-Aug-2025
Court
District Munsif Court, Gudiyatham
Judge
2-District Munsif, Gudiyatham
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CLOSED
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jayammal (Died)
Adv. JAYACHANDRAN G
-
2.Chandrasekar
Adv. JAYACHANDRAN G
-
3.Suresh Babu
Adv. JAYACHANDRAN G
-
4.Sudhakar
Adv. JAYACHANDRAN G
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Tahsildar, Gudiyatham Taluk Vellore District Advocate - LOGANATHAN K
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The District Munsif, Gudiyattam closed the execution petition filed by the decree holders (Jayammal, Chandrasekar, Suresh Babu, and Sudhakar) against the Tahsildar. The court accepted the petitioner's counsel's submission that the respondent had already subdivided the petitioner's property and issued a patta (land deed), thereby satisfying the decree's requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Munsif, Gudiyatham
-
12-Mar-2026
Counter
District Munsif, Gudiyatham
-
04-Mar-2026
Counter
District Munsif, Gudiyatham
-
13-Feb-2026
Counter
District Munsif, Gudiyatham
-
12-Jan-2026
Counter
District Munsif, Gudiyatham
-
12-Dec-2025
Counter
District Munsif, Gudiyatham
-
14-Nov-2025
Counter
District Munsif, Gudiyatham
-
07-Nov-2025
Counter
District Munsif, Gudiyatham
-
10-Oct-2025
Counter
District Munsif, Gudiyatham
-
28-Aug-2025
Counter
District Munsif, Gudiyatham
-
01-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 13/2025
The District Munsif, Gudiyattam closed the execution petition filed by the decree holders (Jayammal, Chandrasekar, Suresh Babu, and Sudhakar) against the Tahsildar. The court accepted the petitioner's counsel's submission that the respondent had already subdivided the petitioner's property and issued a patta (land deed), thereby satisfying the decree's requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts