BALARAMAN S vs KASI S — 23/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
EP - Execution Petition
CNR: TNVL100000802022
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
110/2022
Filing Date
29-04-2022
Registration No
23/2022
Registration Date
01-06-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Gudiyatham
Judge
2-District Munsif, Gudiyatham
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BALARAMAN S
Adv. RAMACHANDRAN G
Respondent(s)
KASI S
RAJ KUMAR K
JAYARAMAN S
GOPAL
HARI
CHANDRA SEKAR
GUNA
ANBU
VENKATESAN N
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif, Gudiyatham
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 13-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 23-01-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 16-12-2025 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 20-11-2025 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary The petition filed by S. Balaraman for appointment of an advocate commissioner to document damages to the suit property, pipeline, and channel was dismissed without cost by the District Munsif Court, Gudiyattam on December 16, 2025. The court held that the petitioner cannot use this petition to collect evidence for rights not decreed in the original OS.157/2013 judgment and failed to show sufficient cause, as damages were already the subject of a separate damages suit (OS.41/2018) filed seven years prior. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The petition filed by S. Balaraman for appointment of an advocate commissioner to document damages to the suit property, pipeline, and channel was dismissed without cost by the District Munsif Court, Gudiyattam on December 16, 2025. The court held that the petitioner cannot use this petition to collect evidence for rights not decreed in the original OS.157/2013 judgment and failed to show sufficient cause, as damages were already the subject of a separate damages suit (OS.41/2018) filed seven years prior. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts