GOMATHI ALIES M.SHANASS vs THE STATE OF TAMILNADU REP. BY ITS DISTRICT COLLECTOR OFVELLORE DISTRICT Advocate - LOGANATHAN K — 79/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Disposed: Contested--Decreed without cost on 16th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVL100000752022
Filing Number
105/2022
Filing Date
28-04-2022
Registration No
79/2022
Registration Date
29-06-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Gudiyatham
Judge
2-District Munsif, Gudiyatham
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed without cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOMATHI ALIES M.SHANASS
Adv. MOGANARAJU K
CHITRA S
Adv. MOGANARAJU K
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF TAMILNADU REP. BY ITS DISTRICT COLLECTOR OFVELLORE DISTRICT Advocate - LOGANATHAN K
THE TAHSILDAR
Adv. LOGANATHAN K
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif, Gudiyatham
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 07-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Gomathi Alies M.Shanass and Chitra S v. State of Tamil Nadu The court partially decreed the suit, declaring that Sampath S/o.Kannan, missing since 2005 (17+ years), is presumed civilly dead under Section 108 of the Indian Evidence Act. However, the court dismissed the plaintiffs' claim to be declared sole legal heirs and denied the mandatory injunction for a legal heirship certificate, finding the plaintiffs failed to adequately plead and prove their status as exclusive heirs and Sampath's parentage, and should have first applied to the Tahsildar before approaching the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Gomathi Alies M.Shanass and Chitra S v. State of Tamil Nadu The court partially decreed the suit, declaring that Sampath S/o.Kannan, missing since 2005 (17+ years), is presumed civilly dead under Section 108 of the Indian Evidence Act. However, the court dismissed the plaintiffs' claim to be declared sole legal heirs and denied the mandatory injunction for a legal heirship certificate, finding the plaintiffs failed to adequately plead and prove their status as exclusive heirs and Sampath's parentage, and should have first applied to the Tahsildar before approaching the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts