RAJAN .M vs DHANARAJ Advocate - BOOPATHI K M — 22/2018
Case under Sugar Development Fund Act Section 21. Status: For further Proceedings. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
EP - Execution Petition
CNR: TNVL100000692018
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
Filing Number
69/2018
Filing Date
07-04-2018
Registration No
22/2018
Registration Date
07-04-2018
Court
District Munsif Court, Gudiyatham
Judge
2-District Munsif, Gudiyatham
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJAN .M
Adv. THANDAPANI.B
NALINI.R
Respondent(s)
DHANARAJ Advocate - BOOPATHI K M
GOPAL
GOVINDASAMI
MUNIYAMMAL
MUTHULAKSHMI
Adv. BOOPATHI K M
SELVI
ARUNA
Adv. BOOPATHI K M
KASTHURI
Adv. BOOPATHI K M
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif, Gudiyatham
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
For further Proceedings
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 10-04-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 13-03-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 17-02-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 03-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case 22/2018 Summary This is a deposition of witness PW.1 (Rajan) in a civil matter before the District Munsif Court, Gudiyattam, Vellore District, dated 09.01.2026. The witness testified regarding a petition seeking to send female respondents (Munimma, Muthulakshmi, Aru, and Kasturi) to civil jail. The witness denied making false statements, denied concealing a pending partition case (Case 36/2015), and clarified that no formal complaint was filed in this matter. The court found the petition frivolous and dismissed it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 22/2018 Summary This is a deposition of witness PW.1 (Rajan) in a civil matter before the District Munsif Court, Gudiyattam, Vellore District, dated 09.01.2026. The witness testified regarding a petition seeking to send female respondents (Munimma, Muthulakshmi, Aru, and Kasturi) to civil jail. The witness denied making false statements, denied concealing a pending partition case (Case 36/2015), and clarified that no formal complaint was filed in this matter. The court found the petition frivolous and dismissed it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts