REVATHI S vs THE MANAGEMENT BAIER SHOES INDIA PVT.LTD.SOMALAPURAM VILLAGE ROAD, AMBUR — 94/2024

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2A2IDACT. Status: Batta. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Batta Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNVL020002172024

Filing Number

217/2024

Filing Date

12-Nov-2024

Registration No

94/2024

Registration Date

14-Nov-2024

Court

Principal Labour Court, Vellore

Judge

5-Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2A2IDACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.REVATHI S

    Adv. GOPAL A B

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE MANAGEMENT BAIER SHOES INDIA PVT.LTD.SOMALAPURAM VILLAGE ROAD, AMBUR

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Batta

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  3. 06-Feb-2026

    Batta

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  4. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  5. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  6. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  7. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  8. 05-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  9. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  10. 24-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  11. 26-Sep-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary Case No.: O.P. No. 94/2024 | Date: 26.09.2025 Outcome: Petition dismissed. The court found no grounds for relief, as the petitioner failed to provide documentary evidence of medical treatment claimed and did not submit supporting documents to the court despite receiving compensation of ₹83,877 and ₹29,491 from the respondent on 07.05.2024, which the petitioner had acknowledged accepting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 26-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  13. 22-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  14. 11-Jul-2025

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  15. 11-Jul-2025

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  16. 13-Jun-2025

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  17. 25-Apr-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  18. 28-Feb-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  19. 10-Jan-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  20. 27-Dec-2024

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  21. 14-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 12-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 94/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No.: O.P. No. 94/2024 | Date: 26.09.2025 Outcome: Petition dismissed. The court found no grounds for relief, as the petitioner failed to provide documentary evidence of medical treatment claimed and did not submit supporting documents to the court despite receiving compensation of ₹83,877 and ₹29,491 from the respondent on 07.05.2024, which the petitioner had acknowledged accepting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case