S. YASODHA vs PRIYADHARSHINI ENGINEERING COLLEGE, Advocate - KARUNAGARAN M — 46/2025

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33C2IDACT. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

CP - Claim Petition

CNR: TNVL020001222025

Filing Number

122/2025

Filing Date

18-Jun-2025

Registration No

46/2025

Registration Date

01-Jul-2025

Court

Principal Labour Court, Vellore

Judge

5-Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33C2IDACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S. YASODHA

    Adv. S. TAMIZHARASI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRIYADHARSHINI ENGINEERING COLLEGE, Advocate - KARUNAGARAN M

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    The petition is dismissed. The court found no merit in the petitioner's claims regarding underpaid wages from 1999-2017 and rejected arguments about delayed salary payments and alleged document discrepancies, concluding the petition lacks legal basis for intervention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  4. 06-Feb-2026

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  7. 09-Jan-2026

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  8. 19-Dec-2025

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  9. 07-Nov-2025

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  10. 10-Oct-2025

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  11. 12-Sep-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  12. 25-Jul-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  13. 01-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 18-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 46/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The petition is dismissed. The court found no merit in the petitioner's claims regarding underpaid wages from 1999-2017 and rejected arguments about delayed salary payments and alleged document discrepancies, concluding the petition lacks legal basis for intervention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case