MUNUSAMY S vs THE MANAGEMENT CHEYYAR CO OPERATIVE SUGAR MILL THIRUVANNAMALAI — 41/2024

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33C2. Status: For further Proceedings. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

For further Proceedings Next hearing 12-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CP - Claim Petition

CNR: TNVL020000832024

Filing Number

83/2024

Filing Date

03-Jun-2024

Registration No

41/2024

Registration Date

23-Jul-2024

Court

Principal Labour Court, Vellore

Judge

5-Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33C2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUNUSAMY S

    Adv. RAJAKUMAR M

  2. 2.MARI A

    Adv. RAJAKUMAR M

  3. 3.MANI A

    Adv. RAJAKUMAR M

  4. 4.ARUMUGAM K

    Adv. RAJAKUMAR M

  5. 5.CHELLAPPAN S

    Adv. RAJAKUMAR M

  6. 6.KARUNAKARAN A.K.

    Adv. RAJAKUMAR M

  7. 7.KANNIYAPPAN M

    Adv. RAJAKUMAR M

  8. 8.VETRIVEL S

    Adv. RAJAKUMAR M

  9. 9.MUNUSAMY T

    Adv. RAJAKUMAR M

  10. 10.THIRUNAVUKARASU C

    Adv. RAJAKUMAR M

  11. 11.GANESAN C

    Adv. RAJAKUMAR M

  12. 12.KUPPAN M

    Adv. RAJAKUMAR M

  13. 13.SANKARA NARAYANAN R

    Adv. RAJAKUMAR M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE MANAGEMENT CHEYYAR CO OPERATIVE SUGAR MILL THIRUVANNAMALAI

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-May-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  3. 15-May-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: 41/2024 Outcome: Amendment petition ALLOWED The Additional Labour Court, Vellore granted the petitioners' application to amend their computation petition. The 13 petitioner-employees sought to increase their occupational wage claim from 40% to 100%, arguing they inadvertently filed with the lower percentage despite being entitled to the full amount based on prior High Court orders. The court found the amendment timely and reasonable, permitting the petitioners to present their complete claim before trial, with the merits regarding entitlement to be determined later. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 23-Feb-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  9. 23-Jan-2026

    IA Pending

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  10. 12-Dec-2025

    IA Pending

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  11. 14-Nov-2025

    IA Pending

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  12. 17-Oct-2025

    IA Pending

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  13. 19-Sep-2025

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  14. 14-Aug-2025

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  15. 18-Jul-2025

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  16. 08-Jul-2025

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  17. 24-Jun-2025

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  18. 20-Jun-2025

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  19. 16-May-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  20. 21-Mar-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  21. 21-Feb-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  22. 24-Jan-2025

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  23. 20-Dec-2024

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  24. 22-Nov-2024

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  25. 20-Sep-2024

    Counter

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  26. 16-Aug-2024

    Steps

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  27. 23-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 03-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 41/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 41/2024 Outcome: Amendment petition ALLOWED The Additional Labour Court, Vellore granted the petitioners' application to amend their computation petition. The 13 petitioner-employees sought to increase their occupational wage claim from 40% to 100%, arguing they inadvertently filed with the lower percentage despite being entitled to the full amount based on prior High Court orders. The court found the amendment timely and reasonable, permitting the petitioners to present their complete claim before trial, with the merits regarding entitlement to be determined later. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case