KANNADY K vs THE MANAGEMENT-CORRESPONDENT, I.E.L.C. HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED, M.C. ROAD Advocate - DEVARAJAN A.R. — 12/2023
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2A2. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNVL020000222023
Filing Number
22/2023
Filing Date
20-Mar-2023
Registration No
12/2023
Registration Date
05-Apr-2023
Court
Principal Labour Court, Vellore
Judge
5-Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
Last updated 24-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KANNADY K
Adv. SURESH BABU A
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE MANAGEMENT-CORRESPONDENT, I.E.L.C. HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED, M.C. ROAD Advocate - DEVARAJAN A.R.
Case History
-
02-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Orders
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
20-Feb-2026
Arguments
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
06-Feb-2026
Arguments
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
30-Jan-2026
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
09-Jan-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
The court dismissed the petition and upheld the employer's decision to terminate the petitioner's employment dated 25.03.2020 due to COVID-19 lockdown, finding no irregularities in the termination process. The court ruled that the employer was not obligated to provide notice or severance pay, as the petitioner had worked more than 240 days in a year, and directed the employer to provide only accrued benefits and salary upon reinstatement if the employee is rehired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jan-2026
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
19-Dec-2025
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
07-Nov-2025
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
10-Oct-2025
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
26-Sep-2025
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
22-Aug-2025
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
11-Jul-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
11-Jul-2025
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
13-Jun-2025
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
25-Apr-2025
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
14-Mar-2025
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
14-Feb-2025
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
27-Dec-2024
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
27-Nov-2024
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
27-Nov-2024
Evidence
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
25-Oct-2024
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
13-Sep-2024
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
09-Aug-2024
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
12-Jul-2024
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
14-Jun-2024
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
10-May-2024
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
22-Mar-2024
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
09-Feb-2024
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
12-Jan-2024
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
08-Dec-2023
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
10-Nov-2023
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
13-Oct-2023
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
15-Sep-2023
Enquiry
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
11-Aug-2023
Written Statement
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
14-Jul-2023
Written Statement
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
09-Jun-2023
Written Statement
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
05-May-2023
Steps
Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.
-
05-Apr-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Mar-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 12/2023
The court dismissed the petition and upheld the employer's decision to terminate the petitioner's employment dated 25.03.2020 due to COVID-19 lockdown, finding no irregularities in the termination process. The court ruled that the employer was not obligated to provide notice or severance pay, as the petitioner had worked more than 240 days in a year, and directed the employer to provide only accrued benefits and salary upon reinstatement if the employee is rehired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts