RAMAMOORTHY N vs THE MANAGEMENT SECRETARY TIRUPATTUR SARVODAYA SANG NO 306 OLD NO 87 GANDHI ROAD TIRUPATHUR 635 601 Advocate - PANDIARAJAN M — 5/2023

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2A2. Status: For further Proceedings. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

For further Proceedings Next hearing 27-Mar-2026 this date has passed

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNVL020000092023

Filing Number

9/2023

Filing Date

07-Feb-2023

Registration No

5/2023

Registration Date

16-Feb-2023

Court

Principal Labour Court, Vellore

Judge

5-Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 2A2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMAMOORTHY N

    Adv. SURESH BABU A

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE MANAGEMENT SECRETARY TIRUPATTUR SARVODAYA SANG NO 306 OLD NO 87 GANDHI ROAD TIRUPATHUR 635 601 Advocate - PANDIARAJAN M

Case History

  1. 27-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary The Additional Labour Court, Vellore allowed the petition filed by N. Ramamoorthy under Section 11(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court permitted the petitioner to file two letters dated 22.09.2020 and 26.09.2020 that were allegedly omitted by the respondent management, finding these documents may be essential to decide the validity of the domestic enquiry conducted against the petitioner. The court rejected the respondent's objection that the documents could be manipulated, noting the petitioner was not introducing new documents but copies of letters already sent to management. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    For further Proceedings

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  7. 12-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  8. 09-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  9. 19-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  10. 07-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  11. 24-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  12. 26-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  13. 22-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  14. 11-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  15. 13-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  16. 25-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  17. 28-Mar-2025

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  18. 28-Feb-2025

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  19. 14-Feb-2025

    Arguments

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  20. 10-Jan-2025

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  21. 13-Dec-2024

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  22. 04-Dec-2024

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  23. 27-Nov-2024

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  24. 25-Oct-2024

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  25. 27-Sep-2024

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  26. 23-Aug-2024

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  27. 09-Aug-2024

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  28. 12-Jul-2024

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  29. 14-Jun-2024

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  30. 10-May-2024

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  31. 12-Apr-2024

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  32. 22-Mar-2024

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  33. 23-Feb-2024

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  34. 09-Feb-2024

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  35. 12-Jan-2024

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  36. 08-Dec-2023

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  37. 24-Nov-2023

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  38. 27-Oct-2023

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  39. 13-Oct-2023

    IA Pending

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  40. 15-Sep-2023

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  41. 11-Aug-2023

    Enquiry

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  42. 28-Jul-2023

    Written Statement

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  43. 14-Jul-2023

    Written Statement

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  44. 23-Jun-2023

    Written Statement

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  45. 09-Jun-2023

    Written Statement

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  46. 05-May-2023

    Written Statement

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  47. 24-Mar-2023

    Written Statement

    Presiding Officer, Additional Labour Court.

  48. 16-Feb-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  49. 07-Feb-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Additional Labour Court, Vellore allowed the petition filed by N. Ramamoorthy under Section 11(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court permitted the petitioner to file two letters dated 22.09.2020 and 26.09.2020 that were allegedly omitted by the respondent management, finding these documents may be essential to decide the validity of the domestic enquiry conducted against the petitioner. The court rejected the respondent's objection that the documents could be manipulated, noting the petitioner was not introducing new documents but copies of letters already sent to management. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case