1. TMT.B.VIMALA (DIED) vs THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VELLORE TALUK PS — 17/2025

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 378. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 07th April 2026.

CRLR - Criminal Revision Petition

CNR: TNVL010036642025

Case disposed

Filing Number

2881/2025

Filing Date

06-08-2025

Registration No

17/2025

Registration Date

06-08-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Vellore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge, Vellore

Decision Date

07th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 378
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 440

Petitioner(s)

1. TMT.B.VIMALA (DIED)

Adv. SIVAGURUNATHAN A D

2. THIRU.R.BABURAJAN

Adv. SIVAGURUNATHAN A D

3. MINOR.VENKAT VARSHAN

Adv. SIVAGURUNATHAN A D

4.MINOR.PRIYA VARSHINI

Adv. SIVAGURUNATHAN A D

5. MINOR. JAYA VARSHINI. THE MINORS ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR FATHER NAMELY Mr.BABURAJAN

Adv. SIVAGURUNATHAN A D

Respondent(s)

THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VELLORE TALUK PS (Police Station)

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VELLORE DISTRICT.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge, Vellore

07-04-2026

Disposed

30-03-2026

Orders

18-03-2026

Orders

13-03-2026

Orders

10-03-2026

Orders

Final Orders / Judgements

07-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: Crl.R.P. No. 17 of 2025 Court Decision: The Principal Sessions Judge dismissed the criminal revision petition and confirmed the lower court's dismissal of the FIR registration request. Key Reasoning: The court held that the dispute is essentially civil in nature involving property title, land usage rights, and consent issues—not cognizable criminal offences. Although the petitioners alleged document forgery and illegal soil excavation worth ₹3 crores on their Vellore land, the court found the allegations lack foundational evidence (expert opinion or signature manipulation proof). Critically, the District Collector had granted valid permission for soil excavation dated 29.03.2022, which the petitioners never challenged before competent authorities. The court determined that registering an FIR would constitute abuse of criminal process to settle a civil dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.R.P. No. 17 of 2025 Court Decision: The Principal Sessions Judge dismissed the criminal revision petition and confirmed the lower court's dismissal of the FIR registration request. Key Reasoning: The court held that the dispute is essentially civil in nature involving property title, land usage rights, and consent issues—not cognizable criminal offences. Although the petitioners alleged document forgery and illegal soil excavation worth ₹3 crores on their Vellore land, the court found the allegations lack foundational evidence (expert opinion or signature manipulation proof). Critically, the District Collector had granted valid permission for soil excavation dated 29.03.2022, which the petitioners never challenged before competent authorities. The court determined that registering an FIR would constitute abuse of criminal process to settle a civil dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Vellore All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case