1. TMT.B.VIMALA (DIED) vs THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VELLORE TALUK PS — 17/2025
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 378. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 07th April 2026.
CRLR - Criminal Revision Petition
CNR: TNVL010036642025
Filing Number
2881/2025
Filing Date
06-08-2025
Registration No
17/2025
Registration Date
06-08-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Vellore
Judge
1-Principal District Judge, Vellore
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
1. TMT.B.VIMALA (DIED)
Adv. SIVAGURUNATHAN A D
2. THIRU.R.BABURAJAN
Adv. SIVAGURUNATHAN A D
3. MINOR.VENKAT VARSHAN
Adv. SIVAGURUNATHAN A D
4.MINOR.PRIYA VARSHINI
Adv. SIVAGURUNATHAN A D
5. MINOR. JAYA VARSHINI. THE MINORS ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR FATHER NAMELY Mr.BABURAJAN
Adv. SIVAGURUNATHAN A D
Respondent(s)
THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VELLORE TALUK PS (Police Station)
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VELLORE DISTRICT.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge, Vellore
Disposed
Orders
Orders
Orders
Orders
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Orders |
| 18-03-2026 | Orders |
| 13-03-2026 | Orders |
| 10-03-2026 | Orders |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Crl.R.P. No. 17 of 2025 Court Decision: The Principal Sessions Judge dismissed the criminal revision petition and confirmed the lower court's dismissal of the FIR registration request. Key Reasoning: The court held that the dispute is essentially civil in nature involving property title, land usage rights, and consent issues—not cognizable criminal offences. Although the petitioners alleged document forgery and illegal soil excavation worth ₹3 crores on their Vellore land, the court found the allegations lack foundational evidence (expert opinion or signature manipulation proof). Critically, the District Collector had granted valid permission for soil excavation dated 29.03.2022, which the petitioners never challenged before competent authorities. The court determined that registering an FIR would constitute abuse of criminal process to settle a civil dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Crl.R.P. No. 17 of 2025 Court Decision: The Principal Sessions Judge dismissed the criminal revision petition and confirmed the lower court's dismissal of the FIR registration request. Key Reasoning: The court held that the dispute is essentially civil in nature involving property title, land usage rights, and consent issues—not cognizable criminal offences. Although the petitioners alleged document forgery and illegal soil excavation worth ₹3 crores on their Vellore land, the court found the allegations lack foundational evidence (expert opinion or signature manipulation proof). Critically, the District Collector had granted valid permission for soil excavation dated 29.03.2022, which the petitioners never challenged before competent authorities. The court determined that registering an FIR would constitute abuse of criminal process to settle a civil dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts