A1. SARAVANAVEL S vs THIRUVALAM PS Advocate - PARTHIBAN M M — 948/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVL010014042026

Filing Number

1099/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

948/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Vellore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge, Vellore

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

02

Police Station

THIRUVALAM

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.A1. SARAVANAVEL S

    Adv. SUDHAKAR M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THIRUVALAM PS (Police Station) Advocate - PARTHIBAN M M

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Court of Sessions Division of Vellore District allowed petitioner Saravanavel's petition to modify bail conditions imposed in an earlier order (Cr.M.P. 743/2026). The court modified the requirement that sureties must be blood relatives with property documents to allow normal third-party sureties, finding the original condition practically impossible to comply with. All other bail conditions, including a Rs. 25,000 bond before the Judicial Magistrate Katpadi, remained unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge, Vellore

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 948/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Court of Sessions Division of Vellore District allowed petitioner Saravanavel's petition to modify bail conditions imposed in an earlier order (Cr.M.P. 743/2026). The court modified the requirement that sureties must be blood relatives with property documents to allow normal third-party sureties, finding the original condition practically impossible to comply with. All other bail conditions, including a Rs. 25,000 bond before the Judicial Magistrate Katpadi, remained unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case