A1. SATHIYARAJ M vs THIRUVALAM PS Advocate - PARTHIBAN M M — 945/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 26th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNVL010013992026
Filing Number
1094/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
945/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Vellore
Judge
1-Principal District Judge, Vellore
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
37
Police Station
THIRUVALAM
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
A1. SATHIYARAJ M
Adv. DHARANI C
Respondent(s)
THIRUVALAM PS (Police Station) Advocate - PARTHIBAN M M
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge, Vellore
Disposed
Enquiry
Enquiry
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 18-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 13-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 10-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 945/2026 Summary: The Vellore Sessions Court granted bail to Sathiyaraj M, accused of illegally transporting two units of river sand without a valid permit on March 3, 2026. The court considered his 24-day custody period, clean criminal record, permanent residence, and readiness to furnish sureties, outweighing prosecution concerns about absconding risk. Bail was granted with conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond, two sureties, daily appearance before the Judicial Magistrate, Rs. 3,000 non-refundable deposit to the Mines Department, and prohibitions on tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 945/2026 Summary: The Vellore Sessions Court granted bail to Sathiyaraj M, accused of illegally transporting two units of river sand without a valid permit on March 3, 2026. The court considered his 24-day custody period, clean criminal record, permanent residence, and readiness to furnish sureties, outweighing prosecution concerns about absconding risk. Bail was granted with conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond, two sureties, daily appearance before the Judicial Magistrate, Rs. 3,000 non-refundable deposit to the Mines Department, and prohibitions on tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts