A1 RAJENDIRAN K vs KATPADI PS Advocate - PARTHIBAN M M — 828/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVL010012452026

Filing Number

967/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

828/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Vellore

Judge

1-Principal District Judge, Vellore

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.A1 RAJENDIRAN K

    Adv. MOHAN V

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KATPADI PS (Police Station) Advocate - PARTHIBAN M M

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Vellore Sessions Court granted bail to Rajendiran, accused of illegally transporting 4 units of river sand without a valid permit under Section 303(2) of BNS 2023, considering his 15-day custody period, clean criminal record, and readiness to furnish sureties. The court imposed conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily appearance before the Judicial Magistrate, a non-refundable Rs. 5,000 deposit to the Mines and Minerals Department, and restrictions against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge, Vellore

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge, Vellore

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 828/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Vellore Sessions Court granted bail to Rajendiran, accused of illegally transporting 4 units of river sand without a valid permit under Section 303(2) of BNS 2023, considering his 15-day custody period, clean criminal record, and readiness to furnish sureties. The court imposed conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily appearance before the Judicial Magistrate, a non-refundable Rs. 5,000 deposit to the Mines and Minerals Department, and restrictions against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case