Sakthivel V(SOLE)) vs PALLIKONDA PS Advocate - PARTHIBAN M M — 744/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 07th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNVL010010952026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
839/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
744/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Vellore
Judge
1-Principal District Judge, Vellore
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 24-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sakthivel V(SOLE))
Adv. SURESHKUMAR N
Respondent(s)
-
1.PALLIKONDA PS (Police Station) Advocate - PARTHIBAN M M
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The Principal Sessions Judge of Vellore District dismissed the anticipatory bail petition of Sakthivel, who was accused of performing dangerous motorcycle stunts (including fire stunts) on a public highway near Pallikonda Toll Plaza and posting videos on Instagram. The court rejected bail despite the petitioner's remorse and undertaking not to repeat such acts, finding that granting bail would send a wrong signal to society, considering the serious nature of the offense endangering public safety, the prosecution's strong objection, and the ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge, Vellore
-
06-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge, Vellore
-
04-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge, Vellore
-
02-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge, Vellore
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 744/2026
Summary The Principal Sessions Judge of Vellore District dismissed the anticipatory bail petition of Sakthivel, who was accused of performing dangerous motorcycle stunts (including fire stunts) on a public highway near Pallikonda Toll Plaza and posting videos on Instagram. The court rejected bail despite the petitioner's remorse and undertaking not to repeat such acts, finding that granting bail would send a wrong signal to society, considering the serious nature of the offense endangering public safety, the prosecution's strong objection, and the ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts