MURALI vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE — 702/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 91. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVL010010602026

Case disposed

Filing Number

814/2026

Filing Date

24-02-2026

Registration No

702/2026

Registration Date

24-02-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Vellore

Judge

2-I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vellore

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 91

Petitioner(s)

MURALI

Adv. BALU V

Respondent(s)

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

Hearing History

Judge: 2-I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vellore

23-03-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

Orders

16-03-2026

Orders

10-03-2026

Orders

06-03-2026

Orders

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
IA ORDER

Summary The court allowed accused K. Murali's petition under Section 91 CrPC to obtain the case diary in Crime No.208/2015, finding that the documents are necessary for a just decision despite being sought at the arguments stage. The court reasoned that while parties typically present evidence during trial, the wide powers under Section 91 CrPC can be exercised at any stage if documents are essential to truth-discovery, and denying access to official records not in the accused's custody would prejudice his defence that he was on special duty elsewhere during the alleged custodial death period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court allowed accused K. Murali's petition under Section 91 CrPC to obtain the case diary in Crime No.208/2015, finding that the documents are necessary for a just decision despite being sought at the arguments stage. The court reasoned that while parties typically present evidence during trial, the wide powers under Section 91 CrPC can be exercised at any stage if documents are essential to truth-discovery, and denying access to official records not in the accused's custody would prejudice his defence that he was on special duty elsewhere during the alleged custodial death period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Vellore All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case