MURALI vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE — 702/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 91. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNVL010010602026
Filing Number
814/2026
Filing Date
24-02-2026
Registration No
702/2026
Registration Date
24-02-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Vellore
Judge
2-I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vellore
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MURALI
Adv. BALU V
Respondent(s)
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Hearing History
Judge: 2-I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vellore
Disposed
Orders
Orders
Orders
Orders
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | Orders |
| 16-03-2026 | Orders |
| 10-03-2026 | Orders |
| 06-03-2026 | Orders |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court allowed accused K. Murali's petition under Section 91 CrPC to obtain the case diary in Crime No.208/2015, finding that the documents are necessary for a just decision despite being sought at the arguments stage. The court reasoned that while parties typically present evidence during trial, the wide powers under Section 91 CrPC can be exercised at any stage if documents are essential to truth-discovery, and denying access to official records not in the accused's custody would prejudice his defence that he was on special duty elsewhere during the alleged custodial death period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court allowed accused K. Murali's petition under Section 91 CrPC to obtain the case diary in Crime No.208/2015, finding that the documents are necessary for a just decision despite being sought at the arguments stage. The court reasoned that while parties typically present evidence during trial, the wide powers under Section 91 CrPC can be exercised at any stage if documents are essential to truth-discovery, and denying access to official records not in the accused's custody would prejudice his defence that he was on special duty elsewhere during the alleged custodial death period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts