MARTIN PREMRAJ vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE — 701/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 94. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVL010010592026

Case disposed

Filing Number

813/2026

Filing Date

24-02-2026

Registration No

701/2026

Registration Date

24-02-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Vellore

Judge

2-I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vellore

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 94

Petitioner(s)

MARTIN PREMRAJ

Adv. SAMPATH KUMAR Y

Respondent(s)

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

Hearing History

Judge: 2-I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vellore

23-03-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

Orders

16-03-2026

Orders

10-03-2026

Orders

06-03-2026

Orders

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
IA ORDER

Summary The court allowed the accused's petition under Section 94 of BNSS seeking production of official documents (a Government Order and relieving order) despite the case being at the final arguments stage. The court reasoned that while parties ordinarily must adduce evidence during trial, the court's powers under Section 94 are wide and can be exercised at any stage if documents are necessary for just adjudication; here, the documents are relevant to the accused's defence of official duty and not being present at the crime location, and denying access to public records not in the accused's personal custody would prejudice his fair trial rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court allowed the accused's petition under Section 94 of BNSS seeking production of official documents (a Government Order and relieving order) despite the case being at the final arguments stage. The court reasoned that while parties ordinarily must adduce evidence during trial, the court's powers under Section 94 are wide and can be exercised at any stage if documents are necessary for just adjudication; here, the documents are relevant to the accused's defence of official duty and not being present at the crime location, and denying access to public records not in the accused's personal custody would prejudice his fair trial rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Vellore All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case