MARTIN PREMRAJ vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE — 701/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 94. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNVL010010592026
Filing Number
813/2026
Filing Date
24-02-2026
Registration No
701/2026
Registration Date
24-02-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Vellore
Judge
2-I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vellore
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MARTIN PREMRAJ
Adv. SAMPATH KUMAR Y
Respondent(s)
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Hearing History
Judge: 2-I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vellore
Disposed
Orders
Orders
Orders
Orders
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | Orders |
| 16-03-2026 | Orders |
| 10-03-2026 | Orders |
| 06-03-2026 | Orders |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court allowed the accused's petition under Section 94 of BNSS seeking production of official documents (a Government Order and relieving order) despite the case being at the final arguments stage. The court reasoned that while parties ordinarily must adduce evidence during trial, the court's powers under Section 94 are wide and can be exercised at any stage if documents are necessary for just adjudication; here, the documents are relevant to the accused's defence of official duty and not being present at the crime location, and denying access to public records not in the accused's personal custody would prejudice his fair trial rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court allowed the accused's petition under Section 94 of BNSS seeking production of official documents (a Government Order and relieving order) despite the case being at the final arguments stage. The court reasoned that while parties ordinarily must adduce evidence during trial, the court's powers under Section 94 are wide and can be exercised at any stage if documents are necessary for just adjudication; here, the documents are relevant to the accused's defence of official duty and not being present at the crime location, and denying access to public records not in the accused's personal custody would prejudice his fair trial rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts