SURESH vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE — 700/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 315. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNVL010010582026
Filing Number
812/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
700/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Vellore
Judge
2-I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vellore
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 24-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SURESH
Adv. BALU V
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
IA OrderView PDF
Summary The court allowed the accused's petition to reopen his defense evidence after trial closure, permitting him to testify and produce case diary records to prove he was on official special team duty during the relevant period (June 15-18, 2015) and thus absent from the custodial death incident. The court reasoned that though the petition was filed late, the evidence sought was relevant and essential to the defense's alibi, and the documents were official records beyond the accused's possession requiring court permission to obtain. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vellore
-
18-Mar-2026
Orders
I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vellore
-
16-Mar-2026
Orders
I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vellore
-
10-Mar-2026
Orders
I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vellore
-
06-Mar-2026
Orders
I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vellore
-
04-Mar-2026
Orders
I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vellore
-
02-Mar-2026
Appearance
I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vellore
-
26-Feb-2026
Appearance
I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vellore
-
25-Feb-2026
Appearance
I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vellore
-
24-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 700/2026
Summary The court allowed the accused's petition to reopen his defense evidence after trial closure, permitting him to testify and produce case diary records to prove he was on official special team duty during the relevant period (June 15-18, 2015) and thus absent from the custodial death incident. The court reasoned that though the petition was filed late, the evidence sought was relevant and essential to the defense's alibi, and the documents were official records beyond the accused's possession requiring court permission to obtain. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts